Making the Seam between Morality and
Science:
A Review of
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein
by Marc Lorlin Z. Navisa 2013-38337 Group Xixy
More often than not, the equation E=mc2
keeps popping up in my head even as I take a shower here in our dormitory.
Perhaps, it is undeniably symbolic of man’s ingenuity. Indeed, man has never
been so close to unfolding every secret nature conceals under its skin—the laws,
principles, and mysteries governing it—to use them for his advantage. But what
price have we paid in attaining what we have now which science gave? In the
novel “Frankenstein,” Mary Shelley, the author, shows how science compromises morality
in Victor Frankenstein’s pursuit to crack the mystery behind life and death.
Notable
in the novel is that the monster was made to carry out decent conversations
which is evident in lines such as “I
ought to be thy Adam but I am rather the fallen angel…. Satan has his
companions, fellow-devils, to admire and encourage him; but I am solitary and
detested.” But in the movie, the
monster was made dumb.
From where I see it, James Whale did
this to make the monster’s appearance really digress from the normal, aside
from its gigantic stature and hideous appearance as a conglomerate of corpse
parts. Indeed, if the monster was made to carry out a decent conversation in
the movie, it would not appear as much a freak as it would if it were dumb.
Another notable thing is that the
monster speaks like a monkey, a primate, implying that it is inferior.
The novel’s theme centers on the
battle between two entities: science and morality. It warns us not of the
dangers of science, but of what happens when we indulge in one of these two
entities with the expense of the other. It’s still up to us humans what to make
out of the power science endows us: In the end, it is our conscience that
should work.
God bestowed us with a great thing—a brain—but
along with it came a greater gift—a heart. We must know when to use it.
More often than not, the equation E=mc2 keeps popping up in my
head even as I take a shower in our dormitory. Perhaps, it is undeniably
symbolic of man’s ingenuity; yet as we know, is still far limited. Having read
the novel, I reflected on the present state of science in our society:
In our pursuit for knowledge, we might be forgetting the core values
ascribed to our society; and in the process, I fear it is man himself who
pushes his brethren to peril’s pit. In the same way that E=mc2
embodies man’s curiosity, his insatiable lust for knowledge, I believe, it also
conceals the formula for his annihilation: Extinction=man’s cosmic curiosity.
No comments:
Post a Comment